Technology changed all that in the 20th century. Music — or its recorded artifact, at least — became a product, a thing that could be bought, sold, traded, and replayed endlessly in any context. This upended the economics of music, but our human instincts remained intact. I spend plenty of time with buds in my ears listening to recorded music, but I still get out to stand in a crowd with an audience. I sing to myself, and, yes, I play an instrument (not always well).
We'll always want to use music as part of our social fabric: to congregate at concerts and in bars, even if the sound sucks; to pass music from hand to hand (or via the Internet) as a form of social currency; to build temples where only "our kind of people" can hear music (opera houses and symphony halls); to want to know more about our favorite bards — their love lives, their clothes, their political beliefs. This betrays an eternal urge to have a larger context beyond a piece of plastic. One might say this urge is part of our genetic makeup."
david byrne y la transformación que el negocio musical ha sufrido desde fines del siglo xx
3 comentarios:
Ah este articulo me dip ganas de Ir a in concierto!!! Vivir la irrepetible experiencia de in concierto en vivo!!!
sí!!!!!!! xD. a mí también.
pero en nuestra ciudad, eso es taaaaaaaaaaaaaaaan poco probable. :(
a menos que vayamos a... qué sé yo... voz véis o algo así :S
hahaha tengo muchos errores en ese comment. hahha escribia desde el ipod ahhaa . sorry
Publicar un comentario